Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

At the age of 51 was George Foreman a top ten heavyweight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    At the age of 51 was George Foreman a top ten heavyweight?

    Let's say foreman would of still been fighting would he of still been cracking the top ten? The man was a freak of nature, a one of a kind genetic freak, I think he would of been maybe number 9 or ten

    #2
    No not in the late 90s

    Comment


      #3
      he was 48 when he should of beat briggs. he was 47 when he beat lou savarese. both were up & comers that could punch. he was so disgusted with the briggs verdict that he retired. he figured they wanted him out of the sport. he carefully selected his opponents but he was still doing well considering his age. he won the schulz fight in my opinion.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by joe strong View Post
        he was 48 when he should of beat briggs. he was 47 when he beat lou savarese.
        No, Foreman was age 48 for BOTH the Briggs fight and the Savarese fight in 1997.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Freedom2014 View Post
          No, Foreman was age 48 for BOTH the Briggs fight and the Savarese fight in 1997.
          And he beat them both he done a job on Briggs was totally robbed and tamed the underrated savarese

          Comment


            #6
            props to foreman but hopkins is more of a "genetic freak" as you put it johnny than foreman because foreman could rely on his power whereas bhop has to have reflexes, speed at a lower weight class

            Comment


              #7
              By age of 51, it would have been roughly 2000-01

              I think foreman could beat the guys that Tyson was fighting like orlin Norris but he isn't coming near the top 10

              1 Lennox
              2 evanderl
              3 ibabuchi
              4 tua
              5 vitali
              6 wlad
              7 Byrd
              8 Tyson
              9 grant
              10 Rahman
              11 masked
              12 sanders
              13 Barrett
              14 Botha
              15 Ruiz
              16 eitteinne
              17 Hyde
              18 bean
              19 johnson
              20 Donald

              Comment


                #8
                By the time Foreman beat Moorer he seem to age a year every month. That's what happens when you get that old and are still competing in sports.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
                  By age of 51, it would have been roughly 2000-01

                  I think foreman could beat the guys that Tyson was fighting like orlin Norris but he isn't coming near the top 10

                  1 Lennox
                  2 evanderl
                  3 ibabuchi
                  4 tua
                  5 vitali
                  6 wlad
                  7 Byrd
                  8 Tyson
                  9 grant
                  10 Rahman
                  11 masked
                  12 sanders
                  13 Barrett
                  14 Botha
                  15 Ruiz
                  16 eitteinne
                  17 Hyde
                  18 bean
                  19 johnson
                  20 Donald
                  That is interesting actually, first time in a long way I've seen the rankings from that era. Is this official?

                  Who out of the top 10 could Foreman possibly beat? Rahman maybe? Tua? Could he beat Grant? Does he have the power to stop Byrd....or a shot Tyson?

                  Very interesting that a man in his 50s can even be considered in such discussions. I think Foreman was badly faded by the late 90s but he still had that incredible power which allowed him to level the playing field. Lewis v Foreman in '99, now that would have been some contest.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by MisterHardtop View Post
                    That is interesting actually, first time in a long way I've seen the rankings from that era. Is this official?

                    Who out of the top 10 could Foreman possibly beat? Rahman maybe? Tua? Could he beat Grant? Does he have the power to stop Byrd....or a shot Tyson?

                    Very interesting that a man in his 50s can even be considered in such discussions. I think Foreman was badly faded by the late 90s but he still had that incredible power which allowed him to level the playing field. Lewis v Foreman in '99, now that would have been some contest.
                    2000 and 2001 were pretty good years for Tyson. He was at least as good as he had been since incarceration. I wouldn't have said 'shot' at all......

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP