Originally posted by GhostofDempsey
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why was there no Ali-Foreman rematch?
Collapse
-
-
-
Here's a weird take on Foreman . . .
. . . his overly sensitive nature which caused that emotional collapse after Zaire is what in the end sold all those barbecue grills in the 90s.
Foreman (I) was a wrecking machine, a monster, and a bully to most, but his emotional collapse humanized him and when he made his comeback in '87 he was viewed as failed and vulnerable; the second time around people were willing to embrace him for his sensitivity.
Foreman (I) was Godzilla, Foreman (II) had attached to it the pathos of King Kong.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostI always thought it was because he lost the Young fight. I suspect there are many other stories floating around about Ali's intent, but in the end Foreman needed to win the Young fight and didn't.
That year, 1977 Ali fought Evangelista in May and Shavers in September. Foreman lost to Young in March.
With a Foreman victory in March there would have been room for a rematch in '77.
Before Ali, Evangelista never fought outside of Spain, so I suspect he wasn't a mandatory, but instead just another European walkover fight for Ali.
Shavers on the other hand had a pretty good 1976-1977, (having lost to Ron Lyle back in 1975), but there were no wins over any big names.
Ali could have passed on either Evangelists or Shavers in '77 and made room for Foreman; no one would have complained.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostLooking at BoxRec it looks like Foreman took a full year off after losing to Ali. Had he gotten right back on the horse and beaten Ron Lyle and Joe Frazier sooner maybe public pressure would have started to build more on Ali to do the rematch.
Foreman takes out Frazier and Ali takes out Lyle and by late '75 only Foreman is around for a really big payday. (We have to assume Wepner and Bugner were showcase fights that didn't bring in really big bucks.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostHere's a weird take on Foreman . . .
. . . his overly sensitive nature which caused that emotional collapse after Zaire is what in the end sold all those barbecue grills in the 90s.
Foreman (I) was a wrecking machine, a monster, and a bully to most, but his emotional collapse humanized him and when he made his comeback in '87 he was viewed as failed and vulnerable; the second time around people were willing to embrace him for his sensitivity.
Foreman (I) was Godzilla, Foreman (II) had attached to it the pathos of King Kong.
Don't know if you've ever read Uncle Toms Cabin by abolitionist Harriet Beecher Stowe that Abe Lincoln noted set off the Civil War, but Tom was the hero caught between two worlds tryin to do right by both.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostLooking at BoxRec it looks like Foreman took a full year off after losing to Ali. Had he gotten right back on the horse and beaten Ron Lyle and Joe Frazier sooner maybe public pressure would have started to build more on Ali to do the rematch.
Comment
-
-
Comment