Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Right-Wing ‘Moms for Liberty’ Organizer Is a Convicted *** Offender

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Right-Wing ‘Moms for Liberty’ Organizer Is a Convicted *** Offender

    Discuss.



    Phillip Fisher Jr., who does faith-based outreach for the group in Philadelphia, abused a 14-year-old in 2011.

    is a conservative parental rights group that has chapters all over the United States working to eradicate *****-related discussion in public schools, at least partially under the belief that educators are using it to “groom” children for ***ual relationships. The group might want to look inward first. The Philadelphia Inquirer on Monday that Phillip Fisher Jr. — a pastor, ********** ward leader, and faith coordinator for Moms for Liberty in Philadelphia — is a registered *** offender.

    Fisher was convicted in 2012 for aggravated ***ual abuse of a 14-year-old boy, with the charging documents saying that Fisher, then 25, engaged and oral and **** *** with the boy. Fisher, who pleaded guilty, toldthe Inquirer that the conviction was a “railroad job” by a PAC affiliated with Lyndon LaRouche, the cult-y former presidential candidate whose organization Fisher worked for at the time. “It was a political situation that happened between me and Lyndon LaRouche,” Fisher said. “It was a member of his camp, his party, that made the accusation. They pushed it through.”

    #2
    GhostofDempsey you often post sentiments similar to this group.

    Is it because you, like this guy, are the real groomers you speak about?
    travestyny travestyny likes this.

    Comment


      #3
      don't get diddled

      Comment


        #4
        But, but, but, the children!

        Comment


          #5
          GhostofDempsey - any comments?

          Comment


            #6
            You and the author had to reach back 12 years to dig up an old crime by some ph@g pedo who is the exception rather than the rule. Your party indulges in systemic grooming and pedophilia. This character was ousted by his own party, your party defends them.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
              You and the author had to reach back 12 years to dig up an old crime by some ph@g pedo who is the exception rather than the rule. Your party indulges in systemic grooming and pedophilia. This character was ousted by his own party, your party defends them.
              This isn’t the exception. You keep trying that line . Lol.

              Story was just printed. No one went back 12 years.

              Men like you are always the groomers and pedophiles. They all want to marry teens. Of course you defend them.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                This isn’t the exception. You keep trying that line . Lol.

                Story was just printed. No one went back 12 years.

                Men like you are always the groomers and pedophiles. They all want to marry teens. Of course you defend them.


                Apparently historical crimes against children don’t count, you’re just being unfair.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                  This isn’t the exception. You keep trying that line . Lol.

                  Story was just printed. No one went back 12 years.

                  Men like you are always the groomers and pedophiles. They all want to marry teens. Of course you defend them.
                  The story was just printed by some ******* hack who had to dig for a story from 12 years ago. Not a whole lot of recent examples in the news huh? LOL

                  Again, no one wants to marry teens. Laws were passed so that teens could marry other teens if they got pregnant. Trying to keep the pregnancy rate out of wedlock down to encourage fathers in the household, something your culture is severely lacking, lol.
                  Rockin' Rockin' likes this.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

                    The story was just printed by some ******* hack who had to dig for a story from 12 years ago. Not a whole lot of recent examples in the news huh? LOL

                    Again, no one wants to marry teens. Laws were passed so that teens could marry other teens if they got pregnant. Trying to keep the pregnancy rate out of wedlock down to encourage fathers in the household, something your culture is severely lacking, lol.
                    There are daily examples. I just don’t bother spamming the board. Like I’ve mentioned in the past- just study the history and art of your culture.

                    The pedophilia depicted had been noted time and time again.

                    Of course you guys do. That is why so many **********s block marriage age consent laws.

                    lmfao that isn’t why laws were passed. They were passed so popular people like Fatty Arbuckle, Elvis and Jerry Lee Lewis could marry the teen age girls they were ****ing so it didn’t look as bad.

                    You imbecile if you get pregnant before you get married, that doesn’t change the out of wedlock pregnancy rate.

                    It clearly didn’t keep fathers in the household given the majority of people receiving government assistance are white women with kids and no husband .

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP