Originally posted by OldTerry
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
do you consider yourself to be racist?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
Ok what about the actions of the people that lead to the labeling? How do they factor in?
Ok but as to division- *** marches included people from all races, genders and religions that agreed that police brutality was an issue that needed to be addressed.
Doesn’t that show The actions of the police relative to black people is what caused the initial divide, right?
Lets look at it from another perspective. *****’s election. Ghostof and others say ***** was divisive because of the position he took when the cop arrested Prof. Gates at his home. Wasn’t it The actions of that officer created the division before *****’s speech?
"the actions of the people that lead to the labeling" surely you mean this situationally and do not blame all actions that lead to any labels ... ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
Do you mean this circumstantially or philosophically? To clarify, a principle that applies to all situations, or, a situation juxtaposition only viable under the right conditions?
"the actions of the people that lead to the labeling" surely you mean this situationally and do not blame all actions that lead to any labels ... ?
Like calling people racists. Sure that divides people. I don’t know an instance where one is just labeled that for no reason.
What was done prior that led someone to use that label?
Like claiming *** is racist or communist.
I can understand how calling the group black lives matter could alienate non blacks.
Yet the reason the group was formed- police brutality- you would think is an issue everyone could coalesce around.
From the marches it was clear that *** unified blacks and non blacks around that issue.
Those that didn’t support the issue chose to ostracize themselves and were critical of the group well before they were labeled.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 12-13-2023, 03:02 PM.Marchegiano likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
Ok what about the actions of the people that lead to the labeling? How do they factor in?
Ok but as to division- *** marches included people from all races, genders and religions that agreed that police brutality was an issue that needed to be addressed.
Doesn’t that show The actions of the police relative to black people is what caused the initial divide, right?
Lets look at it from another perspective. *****’s election. Ghostof and others say ***** was divisive because of the position he took when the cop arrested Prof. Gates at his home. Wasn’t it The actions of that officer created the division before *****’s speech?
Comment
-
Originally posted by PACnPBFsuckNot bad raysis, but regular raysisPACnPBFsuck likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by PACnPBFsuckNot bad raysis, but regular raysis
my game is played out and I still try to pick up j skanks.Beercules
PACnPBFsuck like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
Ok what about the actions of the people that lead to the labeling? How do they factor in?
Ok but as to division- *** marches included people from all races, genders and religions that agreed that police brutality was an issue that needed to be addressed.
Doesn’t that show The actions of the police relative to black people is what caused the initial divide, right?
Lets look at it from another perspective. *****’s election. Ghostof and others say ***** was divisive because of the position he took when the cop arrested Prof. Gates at his home. Wasn’t it The actions of that officer created the division before *****’s speech?
2.) Ok but as to division- *** marches included people from all races, genders and religions that agreed that police brutality was an issue that needed to be addressed. Again, you had your bad actors that participated in both violent and criminal behavior. Some people unfairly chose to label everyone associated with *** as being violent and criminal. The fact that the government did little about it gave the appearance of a biased administration (which with regard to the government may be true).
3.) Doesn’t that show The actions of the police relative to black people is what caused the initial divide, right? I don't think so, but it certainly added fuel to the fire.
4.) Lets look at it from another perspective. *****’s election. Ghostof and others say ***** was divisive because of the position he took when the cop arrested Prof. Gates at his home. Wasn’t it The actions of that officer created the division before *****’s speech? I really don't know anything about that, so it would be inappropriate to comment.Rockin' likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment