Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

do you consider yourself to be racist?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by OldTerry View Post

    Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
    Well Math and Science is racist I am told and Blacks are to ****** to use the internet or get an ID... Dems tell us this at every election.

    "Test scores remain low, and improvement is proceeding at a glacial pace. Just 40 percent of California schoolchildren are proficient at math. What should be done? Seattle’s idea is to teach their students that US math education is racist, is used to oppress people of color and the disadvantaged, and has been used to exploit natural resources".​

    Perfect example of painting with a broad brush to label an entire group of people.
    Whose post are you referring to?

    Comment


      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

      Ok what about the actions of the people that lead to the labeling? How do they factor in?

      Ok but as to division- *** marches included people from all races, genders and religions that agreed that police brutality was an issue that needed to be addressed.

      Doesn’t that show The actions of the police relative to black people is what caused the initial divide, right?

      Lets look at it from another perspective. *****’s election. Ghostof and others say ***** was divisive because of the position he took when the cop arrested Prof. Gates at his home. Wasn’t it The actions of that officer created the division before *****’s speech?
      Do you mean this circumstantially or philosophically? To clarify, a principle that applies to all situations, or, a situation juxtaposition only viable under the right conditions?


      "the actions of the people that lead to the labeling" surely you mean this situationally and do not blame all actions that lead to any labels ... ?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post

        Do you mean this circumstantially or philosophically? To clarify, a principle that applies to all situations, or, a situation juxtaposition only viable under the right conditions?


        "the actions of the people that lead to the labeling" surely you mean this situationally and do not blame all actions that lead to any labels ... ?
        Yes. I tried to provide examples where the labeling isn’t what caused the division, the actions did.

        Like calling people racists. Sure that divides people. I don’t know an instance where one is just labeled that for no reason.

        What was done prior that led someone to use that label?

        Like claiming *** is racist or communist.

        I can understand how calling the group black lives matter could alienate non blacks.

        Yet the reason the group was formed- police brutality- you would think is an issue everyone could coalesce around.

        From the marches it was clear that *** unified blacks and non blacks around that issue.

        Those that didn’t support the issue chose to ostracize themselves and were critical of the group well before they were labeled.
        Last edited by The Big Dunn; 12-13-2023, 03:02 PM.
        MoonCheese Marchegiano likes this.

        Comment


          Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

          Ok what about the actions of the people that lead to the labeling? How do they factor in?

          Ok but as to division- *** marches included people from all races, genders and religions that agreed that police brutality was an issue that needed to be addressed.

          Doesn’t that show The actions of the police relative to black people is what caused the initial divide, right?

          Lets look at it from another perspective. *****’s election. Ghostof and others say ***** was divisive because of the position he took when the cop arrested Prof. Gates at his home. Wasn’t it The actions of that officer created the division before *****’s speech?
          Black career criminal and drug addict dies of drug overdose while resisting arrest for half an hour. White cops get railroaded into prison just for doing their job because blacks would riot all over America if they were rightfully found innocent.

          Comment


            Originally posted by PACnPBFsuck
            Not bad raysis, but regular raysis
            Moderate rayciss n shieeet
            PACnPBFsuck PACnPBFsuck likes this.

            Comment


              Originally posted by PACnPBFsuck
              Not bad raysis, but regular raysis
              I will sell you to older Japanese females.

              my game is played out and I still try to pick up j skanks.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Zaroku View Post

                I will sell you to older Japanese females.

                my game is played out and I still try to pick up j skanks.
                I want a J Skank to be my first J pooning

                Comment


                  Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                  Whose post are you referring to?
                  His post Shadoww702

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by PACnPBFsuck

                    You ain’t gonna dew nuffin, you not even Yakuza
                    I’m not and yakuza are struggling

                    meth is under attack bro pachiko parlors are losing to on like games

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                      Ok what about the actions of the people that lead to the labeling? How do they factor in?

                      Ok but as to division- *** marches included people from all races, genders and religions that agreed that police brutality was an issue that needed to be addressed.

                      Doesn’t that show The actions of the police relative to black people is what caused the initial divide, right?

                      Lets look at it from another perspective. *****’s election. Ghostof and others say ***** was divisive because of the position he took when the cop arrested Prof. Gates at his home. Wasn’t it The actions of that officer created the division before *****’s speech?
                      1.) Ok what about the actions of the people that lead to the labeling? How do they factor in? They create a perception that unfairly taints everyone in the group and leads to the labeling. They are the bad actors, and a group is better off without them.

                      2.) Ok but as to division- *** marches included people from all races, genders and religions that agreed that police brutality was an issue that needed to be addressed. Again, you had your bad actors that participated in both violent and criminal behavior. Some people unfairly chose to label everyone associated with *** as being violent and criminal. The fact that the government did little about it gave the appearance of a biased administration (which with regard to the government may be true).

                      3.) Doesn’t that show The actions of the police relative to black people is what caused the initial divide, right? I don't think so, but it certainly added fuel to the fire.

                      4.) Lets look at it from another perspective. *****’s election. Ghostof and others say ***** was divisive because of the position he took when the cop arrested Prof. Gates at his home. Wasn’t it The actions of that officer created the division before *****’s speech? I really don't know anything about that, so it would be inappropriate to comment.
                      Rockin' Rockin' likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP