Originally posted by Mr Mitts
View Post
You provoking me?
Dude repeats two authors all day and gets this. Meanwhile he argues with me as to whether or not Nat Fleischer is a plagiarist. Hmm.
Let's see what some author is not me have to say. Because that is how we prove who reads books around this place ... by citing authors:
"The second attempt to chronicle the journey of black pugilists was Nat Fleischer's "Black Dynamite" series that began in 1938. Released in 5 volumes, Fliescher's work was heavily flawed. Nat, simply plagiarizing directly from "The Lives and Battles of Famous Black Pugilists" by Richard Fox, brought little in terms of historical research." - Kevin Smith of the IBRO page 3 of Black Genesis.
Now my position on Nat is read and educated and no longer just some weird outlier among a gaggle who have never cracked a ****ing book of any kind.
I'm not even a little bit shy about saying, nah dog, not even close. We argue because I am book and source educated while that jabroni got everything he knows from two different magazines. Take Bell's mix in Ring, you have Bronny's full range of history and I can call him like that because I am that damn read.
Point being, jesus ****ing murphy would that not be your answer if you read a book
Reading book, shocker, turns you against the propaganda of the magazine that's controlled the historical narrative since the ****ing 20s despite its numerous scandals and being such a bad source for history a man can sell books covering exactly what that **** was meant to a century ago.
BattlingNelson
Comment