4 killed at the capitol hill

[Lomadeaux]

That means absolutely nothing other than your opinion. It's a fact that Trump has been an inept and irresponsible leader of the country.

Yes we can agree to disagree but the facts are right in front of you whether you want to accept them or not.

You've destroyed all credibility with your posts. You're an ideologist. Nobody can take you seriously.

Couple that with being a complete *****, and no one could ever take your word.

[MOTHERDUCKER]

So the media pretty much either ignores/actively encourages riots/protests last year which caused nearly 2bn worth of damage

But the minute you go to the source.. they go ballistic? barging into the building was indeed ****** and the woman who died ignored police/secret service and paid the price..

But at least they went to the ****ing source of their frustrations

Unlike *** who burned down shops and took over areas that had nothing to do with their issues?

I guess one is "attacking" politicians/elites the other is attacking general/every day people so it's ok with the media?

Besides shouldn't this be marked down as "mostly peaceful" protest? isn't that what you guys were ****ing on about all last year? By your logic.. only a handful of the people at the protest went into the building? so why the double standard now?

[travestyny]

But at least they went to the ****ing source of their frustrations

Ahhhh, so there was a silver lining to storming the Capitol Building. Got it

Besides shouldn't this be marked down as "mostly peaceful" protest? isn't that what you guys were ****ing on about all last year? By your logic.. only a handful of the people at the protest went into the building? so why the double standard now?

I don't think you completely understand what was meant here. There were peaceful protests, like the one Trump busted up to take a damn picture. The protest at the Capitol Building was, obviously, not peaceful.

[MOTHERDUCKER]

Ahhhh, so there was a silver lining to storming the Capitol Building. Got it



I don't think you completely understand what was meant here. There were peaceful protests, like the one Trump busted up to take a damn picture. The protest at the Capitol Building was, obviously, not peaceful.

No you don't understand/pretend not to as usual

By your logic this was a mostly peaceful protest.. just because you don't agree with why their protesting doesn't change that.

Some idiots rushed Capitol Building.. Some even died due to their ******ity.. but most stayed outside and protested normally

Some *** idiots destroyed 2bn worth of property.. murdered/beat random people.. But most protested normally

Why the double standards?

Oh your a disingenuous pos that's why

[travestyny]

No you don't understand/pretend not to as usual

By your logic this was a mostly peaceful protest.. just because you don't agree with why their protesting doesn't change that.

Once again, you don't understand what you are talking about. What was meant was that many of the protests were peaceful. This should make it clear:

93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

I seriously doubt the 93% referred to above is accounting for a percentage within every single protest. That would make no sense.

But if you want to say that this protest at Capitol Hill was mostly peaceful, then go for it. No one is stopping you. I'm sure some will just think you're being asinine.

Some idiots rushed Capitol Building.. Some even died due to their ******ity.. but most stayed outside and protested normally

Some *** idiots destroyed 2bn worth of property.. murdered/beat random people.. But most protested normally

Why the double standards?

I agree with you. There is no double standard. What I'm telling you is that you are twisting what the media was really trying to portray, as I explained above.

Oh your a disingenuous pos that's why

Actually, I just proved that you're an idiot and couldn't understand something very simple to understand

[MOTHERDUCKER]

Once again, you don't understand what you are talking about. What was meant was that many of the protests were peaceful. This should make it clear:



I seriously doubt the 93% referred to above is accounting for a percentage within every single protest. That would make no sense.

But if you want to say that this protest at Capitol Hill was mostly peaceful, then go for it. No one is stopping you. I'm sure some will just think you're being asinine.



I agree with you. There is no double standard. What I'm telling you is that you are twisting what the media was really trying to portray, as I explained above.




Actually, I just proved that you're an idiot and couldn't understand something very simple to understand

Please tell me what businesses/shops got burnt down during this Capitol hill protest? How many non protesters were killed?

[travestyny]

Please tell me what businesses/shops got burnt down during this Capitol hill protest? How many non protesters were killed?

What does this have to do with the point that I made crystal clear above? Trying to change the subject? Did it make too much sense for you to consider it?


Maybe if you took the time to read the things I provide to help you to understand, then you would...understand.

Their report states that more than 2,400 locations reported peaceful protests, while fewer than 220 reported “violent demonstrations.” The authors define violent demonstrations as including “acts targeting other individuals, property, businesses, other rioting groups or armed actors.” Their definition includes anything from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials. In cities where protests did turn violent—these demonstrations are “largely confined to specific blocks,” the report says.

[Clegg]

So the media pretty much either ignores/actively encourages riots/protests last year which caused nearly 2bn worth of damage

But the minute you go to the source.. they go ballistic? barging into the building was indeed ****** and the woman who died ignored police/secret service and paid the price..

But at least they went to the ****ing source of their frustrations

Unlike *** who burned down shops and took over areas that had nothing to do with their issues?

I guess one is "attacking" politicians/elites the other is attacking general/every day people so it's ok with the media?

Besides shouldn't this be marked down as "mostly peaceful" protest? isn't that what you guys were ****ing on about all last year? By your logic.. only a handful of the people at the protest went into the building? so why the double standard now?

It reads like you're trying to put a positive spin on what happened.

Not sure if 'going to the source of frustration' is a good thing. Because ***/antifa or whoever it was that burned down a police station did the wrong thing in my eyes. Whereas the ones peacefully protesting in the street did the right thing and still got pepper sprayed. But you prefer the ones who went to the source of their frustrations?

[GrandmasterWang]

What does this have to do with the point that I made crystal clear above? Trying to change the subject? Did it make too much sense for you to consider it?


Maybe if you took the time to read the things I provide to help you to understand, then you would...understand.

That's actually a pretty damning report in a way.

It's effectively saying there were over 200 violent *** demonstrations. That's heaps!

This Capital incident was only 1 violent demonstration. That's actually under 1% of the violent *** demonstrations per your article.

I'm against rioters in general. I was against the *** vandals and looters and am against these violent maga tards.

Unpatriotic fools the lot of them!

[travestyny]

That's actually a pretty damning report in a way.

It's effectively saying there were over 200 violent *** demonstrations. That's heaps!

This Capital incident was only 1 violent demonstration. That's actually under 1% of the violent *** demonstrations per your article.

I'm against rioters in general. I was against the *** vandals and looters and am against these violent maga tards.

Unpatriotic fools the lot of them!

Well yea. There were a lot more "*** demonstrations." For MAGA there have been about....3??? But they might be at 100% violence. lol