Originally posted by LondonRingRules
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
History of the Heavyweights part 6 (Jack Johnson)
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by YogiAnd when did Louis duck Walcott, Butterfly?
Comment
-
Originally posted by butterfly1964well, they fought in '47 and they're about the same age. put two and two together, yogi.
What do you think is the better way to go?
Comment
-
Originally posted by YogiI could either do that, or...what I could do is check the Heavyweight ratings from Louis' whole title reign and see that it wasn't until after the war when Walcott was even ranked inside the top ten for the division (both Conn & Mauriello were ranked higher than him, as well, when Louis fought them after the war...both the then #1 ranked contender).
What do you think is the better way to go?
Comment
-
Originally posted by butterfly1964because he wasn't ranked means what? did that stop louis from fighting other guys?
If a guy isn't/wasn't ranked inside the top ten then that means he was not considered worthy of a title shot, nor should he be given one...Duh!
Hindsight proves different, but even at the time the first Louis/Walcott fight was announced nobody really thought Walcott had really any chance (first scheduled as a simple exhibition match, but later changed over to a title fight when tickets sales were slow...Louis was an 8-1 favourite, regardless).
And I already pointed out to you in the past that the majority of Louis' title defenses were against one of the top three ranked contders at the time of the title fight, and many of those were against the #1 ranked contender...the guy considered the second best in the division. But hey, do your own research, and then tell me if you can find more than one fighter who wasn't a ranked contedner when given a chance at Louis' title...Good luck with that!
Comment
-
Originally posted by YogiHoly ****, you're a simpleton sometimes (most times, maybe?), man!
If a guy isn't/wasn't ranked inside the top ten then that means he was not considered worthy of a title shot, nor should he be given one...Duh!
Hindsight proves different, but even at the time the first Louis/Walcott fight was announced nobody really thought Walcott had really any chance (first scheduled as a simple exhibition match, but later changed over to a title fight when tickets sales were slow...Louis was an 8-1 favourite, regardless).
And I already pointed out to you in the past that the majority of Louis' title defenses were against one of the top three ranked contders at the time of the title fight, and many of those were against the #1 ranked contender...the guy considered the second best in the division. But hey, do your own research, and then tell me if you can find more than one fighter who wasn't a ranked contedner when given a chance at Louis' title...Good luck with that!
Comment
-
Originally posted by YogiApparently you missed the part where I said "do your own research".
Comment
-
Originally posted by butterfly1964whatever, man.
Let me guess the answer...you'd much rather stick to your ways of simply making **** up in your mind, rather than spending some time looking that info up for yourself, yes?
Comment
Comment