****. Prince kissing sleeping Snow White.

[Anthony342]

Bro, they are talking about the difference between equity and equality. That is an important distinction.

It's obviously not only about overtly doing racist things. It's about a deeper understanding. I don't see why there is an issue with their working for all people to understand these things. It would be one thing if what they are guarding against didin't exist, but it clearly does. They want their employees to have this greater understanding. So the flip side to what you are saying is that if the employees don't like it, then they should find another job.

Yeah and if the employees are being racist, they should get fired. Just hire employees that already have that understanding. It's not their job to teach them or tell them what to learn. It's a customer service job. Those are the skills they need and should get training for, regardless of race. So there's not an issue with understanding that. There's an issue with bringing it into their company. It should only be brought in if there's rampant racism among their employees. So if that has happened, then how many times and in what context?

[Straight Up]

Well according to females he is handsome and has money so it's all good. **** only applies to ugly dudes and actors who don't follow their boss.

[travestyny]

Yeah and if the employees are being racist, they should get fired. Just hire employees that already have that understanding. It's not their job to teach them or tell them what to learn. It's a customer service job. Those are the skills they need and should get training for, regardless of race. So there's not an issue with understanding that. There's an issue with bringing it into their company. It should only be brought in if there's rampant racism among their employees. So if that has happened, then how many times and in what context?

I don't think it's so simple as knowing someone is racist just by looking at them, or that they may harbor racial issues just by looking at them. What lies underneath can be manifested within the Disney experience.

How many movies has Disney had that they've had to change or issue warnings for because they have some element of racism in them. Dumbo has racist tropes in it. Even the Lion King where the hyenas were darker than lions like Simba and spoke with slang for some odd reason. Hmmm. It sounds kind of silly....but then you might think....but why?? Disney had a character named "Jim Crow" for crying out loud. lol. The Peter Pan ride at the park had stereotypical images of indigenous people. Apparently the splash mountain flume ride was inspired by the film, "Song of the South," which has long been called racist due to its depiction of plantation life in the south. Shlt like that. Disney was full of a lot of dumb shlt that seemed off color to say the least and racist or race insensitive. Disney didn't even have a black princess until 2009. All of the little black girls had to be white princesses. Sometimes, little things like that can make a difference.

It's customer service...but that's why it's important. They put on shows for everyone who attends, and it is just trying to be inclusive. They are just trying to make sure that no one leaves feeling like something was off color because of something that their staff either didn't get...or something that lurks underneath from their staff. I don't see the big deal. Knowing is half the battle. So they can study up, do their job the way they are trained to do it, and then go back to being full fledged racist KKK members in their free time for all I care.

[Anthony342]

I don't think it's so simple as knowing someone is racist just by looking at them, or that they may harbor racial issues just by looking at them. What lies underneath can be manifested within the Disney experience.

How many movies has Disney had that they've had to change or issue warnings for because they have some element of racism in them. Dumbo has racist tropes in it. Even the Lion King where the hyenas were darker than lions like Simba and spoke with slang for some odd reason. Hmmm. It sounds kind of silly....but then you might think....but why?? Disney had a character named "Jim Crow" for crying out loud. lol. The Peter Pan ride at the park had stereotypical images of indigenous people. Apparently the splash mountain flume ride was inspired by the film, "Song of the South," which has long been called racist due to its depiction of plantation life in the south. Shlt like that. Disney was full of a lot of dumb shlt that seemed off color to say the least and racist or race insensitive. Disney didn't even have a black princess until 2009. All of the little black girls had to be white princesses. Sometimes, little things like that can make a difference.

It's customer service...but that's why it's important. They put on shows for everyone who attends, and it is just trying to be inclusive. They are just trying to make sure that no one leaves feeling like something was off color because of something that their staff either didn't get...or something that lurks underneath from their staff. I don't see the big deal. Knowing is half the battle. So they can study up, do their job the way they are trained to do it, and then go back to being full fledged racist KKK members in their free time for all I care.

Right, I agree with all that you just said here. So acknowledge that racist past, learn from it and be better in the future. And what I was saying is not if they look racist, but if employees act or treat anyone with racism, they should be fired on the spot. I'm for inclusion too, as long as it's not forced, like the oscars have started to do where they're creating categories that have to fill a quota. If there's talented performers of color or who happen to be women, nominate them. The categories they have should cover that. Disney seems to be starting to be inclusive. I've also seen that with things like black Barbie dolls for a while now. So Disney should just say they have an awful, racist history and they continue to work to correct it.

[travestyny]

Right, I agree with all that you just said here. So acknowledge that racist past, learn from it and be better in the future. And what I was saying is not if they look racist, but if employees act or treat anyone with racism, they should be fired on the spot. I'm for inclusion too, as long as it's not forced, like the oscars have started to do where they're creating categories that have to fill a quota. If there's talented performers of color or who happen to be women, nominate them. The categories they have should cover that. Disney seems to be starting to be inclusive. I've also seen that with things like black Barbie dolls for a while now. So Disney should just say they have an awful, racist history and they continue to work to correct it.

Ok. I can agree with you on that. I also feel like the Oscars thing is odd to some degree. I think they should consider all of the movies that qualify based on their merit period. But I also think they should have a diverse group of people judging. And if the awards goes to only movies that have white men, so be it.

As for Disney, I'm not saying I personally agree with everything they are doing because frankly I don't know what exactly it is that they are doing. But I can agree with them trying to foster inclusivity. Just like I can agree with the Oscars doing as much. I just hope neither is going overboard with it. For instance, I heard something about movies being forced to have a certain number of ********** in it to be considered. I don't agree with that.

Actually, I had to go look it up to see, because I wanted to be sure about it. I found this:

The criteria for best picture consideration will be based on four different overarching standards. Producers must fulfill two of the standards. This can be achieved in various ways, including by featuring a lead actor from an underrepresented minority group, focusing the storyline on such groups, pulling together a production team made of diverse individuals, or providing training opportunities to members of underrepresented groups.

Such underrepresented groups include Black, Hispanic and Native American populations, among others, as well as LGBT+ individuals and people with disabilities.

While the criteria will only fully go into effect in two years' time, producers must submit a confidential form about inclusion standards for best-picture consideration in 2022 and 2023.

So, that's not so bad I think. I need a bit more information...like how many people are needed. But...have a gay guy go around training (ie. staying out of the way but observing) while you are filming, and a hispanic dude on the production team. Ok. Not that big of a deal to me. I would hope that a whole production team isn't only made up of white males anyway. But again, I wish I could find specifically what they want done.

[Anthony342]

Ok. I can agree with you on that. I also feel like the Oscars thing is odd to some degree. I think they should consider all of the movies that qualify based on their merit period. But I also think they should have a diverse group of people judging. And if the awards goes to only movies that have white men, so be it.

As for Disney, I'm not saying I personally agree with everything they are doing because frankly I don't know what exactly it is that they are doing. But I can agree with them trying to foster inclusivity. Just like I can agree with the Oscars doing as much. I just hope neither is going overboard with it. For instance, I heard something about movies being forced to have a certain number of ********** in it to be considered. I don't agree with that.

Actually, I had to go look it up to see, because I wanted to be sure about it. I found this:



So, that's not so bad I think. I need a bit more information...like how many people are needed. But...have a gay guy go around training (ie. staying out of the way but observing) while you are filming, and a hispanic dude on the production team. Ok. Not that big of a deal to me. I would hope that a whole production team isn't only made up of white males anyway. But again, I wish I could find specifically what they want done.

As long as that lead actor or anyone in those categories are talented and not just filling a quota, I can get behind that. I see what they're doing there. And are you really going on about bicycle tape again in that other thread dude? And is that stuff really used in bicycles? People will rarely admit when they're wrong. The best you can hope for is outlasting them in an argument for the TKO win lol. If they're reasonable and things get more civil like here, you can call it a draw or a tap out haha.

Keep schooling fools on here that dare who challenge your boxing knowledge.

[travestyny]

As long as that lead actor or anyone in those categories are talented and not just filling a quota, I can get behind that. I see what they're doing there. And are you really going on about bicycle tape again in that other thread dude? And is that stuff really used in bicycles? People will rarely admit when they're wrong. The best you can hope for is outlasting them in an argument for the TKO win lol. If they're reasonable and things get more civil like here, you can call it a draw or a tap out haha.

Keep schooling fools on here that dare to challenge your boxing knowledge.

LMAO. Nah. I've learned long ago that you can't change anyone's mind here about anything. People believe what they want, even when they know they are wrong deep down. Sometimes I just like to make sure that the argument is presented clearly enough just in case other people googling around stumble upon it, they can see what really is up. It really grinds at me that the history section has some people who just tell blatant lies to fit some kind of weirdo agenda. Lots of it is opinion, which is fine, but there is an element of truth or false that comes up, and the truth should be put out there to help people form their opinions. I feel the history section should be the most sacred area of this forum where truth should prevail, but apparently some others think otherwise. But you know....for all the talk of "winning" or "losing," you can never really win when people are so invested in fitting their agenda at all costs. Eh. It is what it is. I'm hopefully done with that conversation and will never have to talk about bicycle tape again! lol

On the actual tape...I still have no idea what it's used for besides as a dirty trick to lace hand wraps back in the day, and I read Dempsey used it to make jump rope handles (and...on his wraps. lol). I'm assuming it was used on bicycle handles as well.

[TheMyspaceDayz]

I’m getting close to the point where I’m just going to start telling people to stfu. No debate. Nothing.

[i_am_a_champ]

Snow White is the perfect snow bunny slut, would be a great addition to my harem. She could satisfy a horny infidel like me, whether she's awake or asleep.

Shalom

I hope when she wakes up, she wakes up in Africa , surrounded by Masai Warriors and Zulus, who then proceed to savage **** her tight white little snatch with their monster black pringle cans. I hope they got it on tape cos id furiously rub my tiny pecker to that scene

[OldTerry]

The spirit of present times rules.
However, my belief is, that we who are now living will be severly condemned by future generations.
We are aware of climate change, but ain't that willing to change our lifestyle.

We choose to ignore the big issues, and rather discuss 'Snow White'-cases. It's more comfortable to us.
After all, we're only humans

Climate change is a good subject for discussion but we need to broaden the scope on the reasons, the culprits and the solutions. Let's talk about sunspots, worldwide Aerosol spraying (chemtrails) by the military under UN direction. I'd also like to know why the very same reasons the globalists now give to explain global warming are the same as the reasons they gave to explain global cooling back in the 1970's.