Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Father of Michael Brown joins anti-*** movement amid demands over whereabouts of $90MILLION
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Lomadeaux View PostThey literally burned the country down last year...
How did we ever survive? What did our "Law and Order President" do to protect us? Failed to make America great again in the end, huh? Say it aint so.
The horror.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
If this isn't the biggest tiniest violin bullshlt sob story ever. Wahhhhh. "They literally burned the country down."
How did we ever survive? What did our "Law and Order President" do to protect us? Failed to make America great again in the end, huh? Say it aint so.
The horror.man down likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
He allowed governors and mayors to govern and do their jobs, they failed miserably. Governors from Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, NY, and other states allowed rioting and looting. Respective mayors from those states biggest cities did absolutely nothing, in fact some of them said we would have a summer of love as portions of her city became autonomous zones renamed CHAZ and they would not allow police to enter. Damage caused by riots and looting and failure to enforce laws have run into the billions. But don’t worry, Uncle Joe will bail them all out with our tax dollars.
You're not seeing what you're seeing lol.GhostofDempsey likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
The problem is, they don't suffer from discriminatory violence. That's a myth. If you commit more crimes, you'll have more interactions with police, and if you resist the police you'll have a greater chance of a violent encounter that doesn't go your way. Simple really.
Conclusions
Reviewing the four previous sections, three findings merit emphasis. First, even when controlling for arrest demographics, participating departments revealed racial disparities across multiple levels of force severity. Second, even when controlling for the very rare occurrence of arrest for Part I violent crime within a demographic—an event that previous research suggests is only modestly more likely in and of itself to result in a use of force incident—25%-55% of participating departments still revealed robust racial disparities that disadvantaged Blacks. Third, and finally, analyses of each department revealed that Tasers were the second most common use of force option, ranging from roughly 8 times to 18 times more common than use of deadly force and less common only than bodily contact—the least severe use of force option on the continuum. Taken together, these findings suggest:
1) That racially disparate crime rate is an insufficient explanation of racially disparate use of force rates for this sample of police departments. Given that these departments range widely in size and represent urban cities, suburban counties, and transportation police in geographically diverse jurisdictions, the results are suggestive that these findings may generalize beyond the sample.
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostShow me the stats for how many blacks are killed by whites each year, then show me the stats for how many blacks are killed by blacks each year. Finally, show me the stats on how many whites are killed by blacks each year. You find some staggering results.
The only thing it really shows is that people kill people that they live in close proximity to. Who knows what the 7% change is truly a result of. Most likely a result of different average poverty level. And again, the stats don't take into account who is a non-hispanic white/black. I wouldn't be surprised to find more hispanics living in closer proximity to blacks. Nor are the numbers in any way related to racial discrimination.
But what does this even have to do with ***? You just claimed discriminatory violence was a myth in your first paragraph with no proof, and then rambled about a completely unrelated topic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
He allowed governors and mayors to govern and do their jobs, they failed miserably. Governors from Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, NY, and other states allowed rioting and looting. Respective mayors from those states biggest cities did absolutely nothing, in fact some of them said we would have a summer of love as portions of her city became autonomous zones renamed CHAZ and they would not allow police to enter. Damage caused by riots and looting and failure to enforce laws have run into the billions. But don’t worry, Uncle Joe will bail them all out with our tax dollars.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Citizen Koba View Post
No, man, we just got different sources for our information. And different life experiences.
The media souces you use carefully crafted a particular narrative for you, exclusively focused on the most visceral imagery available to sway your emotions, evoke your anger, and repeated over and over that 'antifa' and *** were the culprits despite the police and court reports showing that the vast majority of looting and property damage was carried out by opportunistic local criminals entirely unconnected to either movement. Standard propaganda techniques. Once they'd got you hooked to a particular narrative you did most of the rest yourself... it's just the way we humans are, always trying to interpret reality to fit with our existing beliefs.
They didn't show you that the overwhelming majority of both protests and protestors were entirely peaceful and that where there was violence it was most often a result of provocations by counterprotestors - like The Proud Boys - deliberately seeking to create optics for the media
They told you that *** and antifa were the 'murderers' despite the cars driven into protestors, despite that more people were killed by right wing counter protestors and police than by anyone associated with the protests, despite that many of the deaths were of looters with no connection to antifa or *** killed by police or property owners and despite no evidence of premediation involved in any of the deaths..
They tried to convince you that the chaos and anger was because of *** and 'antifa' instigators (hinting at shadowy cabals plotting murder and mayhem) rather than just a symptom of the simmering anger at injustice that had been building for years - decades - that it was down to a few bad actors rather than because of the deep underlying divisions within your society and a whole lot of normal, regular people who had just had enough.
I just see a different picture to you man. I like to think a bigger one, but maybe that's just my own arrogance. Thing is, I've seen these kindsa stories play out before - in person - different in detail and scale but much the same in many ways. The media distortions and lies, the provocations. I also know protestors and activists, hell my parents were activists FFS and I've been one myself at various periods of my life, and I can tell you they ain't what you're being told... vast majority anyway.
Well. Anyways. That's why we see things different. Ain't saying there isn't assholes and criminals and misfits within antifa or ***, of course, there is in every movement, nor am I denying that some protestors did commit crimes and deserve to pay for 'em, merely that they are very much in the minority in either movement and were massively overemphasized by the RWM.
The media doesn’t tell me ****.. the media obviously tells you everything.
5B of property damage, over a thousand police officers injured or killed.. thousands of lives ruined.. destroyed…. All in ******** run cities.
Antifa and *** are by DEFINITION…. ********* groups. You’ve lost… and you can’t admit it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by man down View Post
Hes acting like that's all they did. I'd post more videos but as anyone with half a brain cell can see it won't matter.
You're not seeing what you're seeing lol.man down likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
There are studies that don't agree with you. Besides studies like the one below, you can look at stop and frisk numbers to know that what you are saying is not accurate.
Conclusions
Reviewing the four previous sections, three findings merit emphasis. First, even when controlling for arrest demographics, participating departments revealed racial disparities across multiple levels of force severity. Second, even when controlling for the very rare occurrence of arrest for Part I violent crime within a demographic—an event that previous research suggests is only modestly more likely in and of itself to result in a use of force incident—25%-55% of participating departments still revealed robust racial disparities that disadvantaged Blacks. Third, and finally, analyses of each department revealed that Tasers were the second most common use of force option, ranging from roughly 8 times to 18 times more common than use of deadly force and less common only than bodily contact—the least severe use of force option on the continuum. Taken together, these findings suggest:
1) That racially disparate crime rate is an insufficient explanation of racially disparate use of force rates for this sample of police departments. Given that these departments range widely in size and represent urban cities, suburban counties, and transportation police in geographically diverse jurisdictions, the results are suggestive that these findings may generalize beyond the sample.
Funny that you left out whites killing whites. The only stats any of us have about interracial homicide from the FBI doesn't discriminate between hispanic and non hispanic whites/blacks. The numbers look roughly something like this: Whites killing Whites 80.7%. Whites killing blacks 8%. Backs killing Blacks: 88.9%. Backs killing Whites: 15.5%. FBI stats from 2018 apparently.
The only thing it really shows is that people kill people that they live in close proximity to. Who knows what the 7% change is truly a result of. Most likely a result of different average poverty level. And again, the stats don't take into account who is a non-hispanic white/black. I wouldn't be surprised to find more hispanics living in closer proximity to blacks. Nor are the numbers in any way related to racial discrimination.
But what does this even have to do with ***? You just claimed discriminatory violence was a myth in your first paragraph with no proof, and then rambled about a completely unrelated topic.
Facts are facts. Each year over 500 whites are killed by blacks, while about 200 blacks are killed by whites. The murder ratio is nearly 3:1. Assault and **** ratios are closer to 10:1.
Comment
Comment